Assessment
in a Constructivist, Technology-Supported Learning
Abstraction
From the conversation we gather that
some students:
·
Memorize very much for the test.
·
Study only for passing score and a passing
grade.
The questions we raise are: “is it
really bad to memorize for the test?” and is it not good to study for a score
and for a grade? The answer to both questions is a NO.
Authentic assessment is most appropriate
for the constructive classroom. Authentic assessment measures collective
abilities, written and oral expression skills, analytical skills, manipulative
skills, (like computer skills ) integration, creativity, and ability to work
collaboratively.
In authentic assessment, students
perform real world tasks, thus the word “authentic” assessment includes
performance or product assessment.
·
You and your students may develop a rubric.
It can be a collaborative effort for both of you- teacher and students- in line
with the practice of self-assessment, which is highly encourage. In fact with
scoring rubric, standards are clearly set at the beginning for you and your
students.
·
Assessment in a technology-supported
environment necessarily includes display of skillful and creative use of
technologies, old and recent, because that is what is naturally expected of us
in the real world, a technology-dominated world.
·
In the 21 century, we need to be computer
literate and fluent or we get lost or become helpless.
·
These presentations need performance-based
assessment or product assessment. It is a direct assessment.
·
We do not test their computer and creative
skills, their analytical and integrative skills by way of a multiple-choice.
·
A technology-supported classroom maximizes the
use of old and new technology, students are expected to demonstrate learning
with the use of both old and new technology.
·
Students may use transparencies OHP to
demonstrate the learned skill of topic presentation.
This is process or performance
assessment. How do we assess of our students have learned the constructivist’s
way of thinking, behaving and living? The rubric for understanding and improving
meaningful environments.
Walang komento:
Mag-post ng isang Komento